Recognition and enforcement of both international and domestic awards is regulated by the Bulgarian International Commercial Arbitration Act (hereinafter: “ICAA”; an unofficial translation of the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry is available here: http://www.bcci.bg/bcci-lawofarbitr-en.html).

The relevant provisions of the ICAA are contained in section 7, which entails Art. 47 to 51 ICAA. The New York Convention applies to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The Bulgarian Civil Procedure Code defines arbitrability and regulates the proceedings before courts. Foreign awards that do not fall within the scope of international conventions are recognized and enforced in accordance with Art. 118 to 122 of the Bulgarian Code of Private International Law.

Yes, the New York Convention entered into force on 8 January 1962. However, one should be aware that Bulgaria has made a reciprocity reservation in the following terms: “Bulgaria will apply the Convention to recognition and enforcement of awards made in the territory of another Contracting State. With regard to awards made in the territory of non-Contracting States it will apply the Convention only to the extent to which these States grant reciprocal treatment.”

For foreign awards, the ICAA designates the Sofia City Court as the single state court having jurisdiction to issue writs of execution for the purpose of commencement of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Foreign arbitral awards are not automatically recognized (as for example in Finland), however the inspection of the arbitral award is merely of formal nature and only examines whether the parties are correct, whether the award has been signed and similar formalities. The recognition process generally takes two to three weeks.

For domestic awards on the other hand, the amended ICAA introduces a new jurisdictional criterion for the enforcement of domestic arbitral awards: the competent state district court is the court at the domicile or at the seat of the award-debtor.

After verifying whether the award should be recognized in an expedited procedure, the creditor must file an enforcement request before the Sofia City Court requiring the issuance of a writ of execution enabling the claimant to enforce the award pursuant to Art. 51 III ICAA.

The proceedings regarding foreign arbitral awards are adversarial with participation of both parties. The proceedings regarding domestic awards are ex parte.

In case of a foreign arbitral award, the New York Convention is applicable and thus the application must be accompanied by duly authenticated originals or duly certified copies of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement. Under the Code of Private International Law, one is also required to present a certificate from the tribunal which issued the award that it has entered into force. It is also advisable to submit proof that the award has been notified to the award-debtor.

An application for enforcement of a domestic award must be accompanied by a duly certified copy of the award and evidence that it was served on the debtor. The court only checks whether the award has any obvious prima facie irregularities, such as if it is not signed, and then directly issues an enforcement order.

Yes, a certified translation is necessary. Art. IV (2) of the New York Convention applies directly.

Under the Bulgarian Legal Profession Act, you either need to be admitted to the Bulgarian Bar or have a temporary permit according to Art. 19 b) I of the same Act (which a European attorney could easily obtain) in order to be able to validly submit applications to court.

Yes. First, in the case of foreign arbitral awards, one must additionally file the duly authenticated original or duly certified copies of the arbitration agreement as well. When a domestic award is concerned, the authenticated original or duly certified copy of the award would suffice.

Secondly, the proceedings for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards are adversarial, while the proceedings for the enforcement of domestic awards are ex parte.

The court fees for recognition of a foreign award amount to 0.4 % of the sum awarded. Half of these charges are collected for an appeal. The court fees for issuance of an enforcement order on a domestic award are 0.2 % of the sum awarded. The minimum attorney’s fees amount to 2 % of the awarded sum.

The general rule for cost allocation according to Art. 78 of the Bulgarian Code of Civil Procedure is that the claimant should initially cover all costs and taxes related to the initiation of enforcement proceedings. After the bailiff has enforced the award by taking or selling assets belonging to the debtor, he would also put aside enough assets from the enforcement proceedings in order to cover all enforcement related costs, so ultimately the respondent would pay.

Pursuant to the Arbitration Rules of the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (hereinafter: “BCCI” and “BCCI Arbitration Rules”), unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the costs are allocated according to the rule ‘the costs follow the event’. The costs must be reasonable and supported by sufficient proof.

There aren’t any statistics available on the average duration but the procedure for the recognition of a foreign award would generally last no longer than two to three weeks. If the decision is not appealed by the debtor, the writ of execution should be issued within another three to four weeks.

The grounds for refusal of enforcement of foreign awards are those listed in Article V Section 1 of the New York Convention and also the additional grounds of Article V Section 2.

The most recent amendment of ICAA has removed public policy as a ground for setting aside awards. However, foreign awards can still be resisted enforcement for reasons of violation of public policy on the basis of the New York Convention.

Partial or interim awards generally need to fulfill the same requirements as final awards and in case they comply with the requirements and have a subject which is enforceable, they will be recognized and enforced.

Except for the public policy ground and the ground found under Art. V (1) (e) on awards that have not yet become binding, the grounds on the basis of which Bulgarian courts may set aside domestic awards are the same as those contained in Art. V New York Convention.

Courts do not differentiate between foreign and domestic awards in this regard. See Q#14 for more details on this.

No, after a decision recognizing the award has entered into force, the Sofia City Court, at the request of the claimant, will issue a writ of execution.

Yes, the decision recognizing an arbitral award is subject to appeal before the Sofia Court of Appeal, and subsequently to appeal before the Supreme Court of Cassation. The grounds for non-recognition are the grounds for non-recognition contained in Art. V of the New York Convention.

No. If the award has been set aside by a competent authority at the seat of the arbitration and this can be proven by the respective documents, the claimant would not be able to enforce it according to Art. V 1. e) of the New York Convention in conjunction with Art. 51 II ICAA.

One could appeal the decision as described in Section Q#18. In case the award is subsequently set aside, the decision for enforcement of the award would be overturned.

Before and during the arbitration proceedings, either party may request state courts to impose interim measures in regards to the claim and the evidence. A request for interim measures is not considered inconsistent with the arbitration agreement or waiver of it. The courts may grant a ban to transfer real estate, an attachment of movables and receivables, or any other appropriate measure.

Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may also, at the request of a party, order the other party to take appropriate measures to preserve the applicant’s rights. The provisions give arbitrators wide discretion to grant measures directed at preservation of evidence, or preservation of status quo, or facilitation of the enforcement of the award.

The party seeking enforcement receives a writ of execution. The writ of execution is the document empowering the bailiff to enforce the award. There is also a further formal requirement: one must draft a motion for the start of enforcement proceedings and hand it to the bailiff.

Yes, the private bailiff gets paid by the party seeking enforcement. There is a national tariff agreement determining the costs. A fee is due for the commencement of the enforcement proceedings (amounting to ca. 10 €) and also for the inquiry into the assets of the respondent (amounting to ca. 25 €).

For enforcement measures aimed at movable items the fee due amounts to 2 % of their value (but not less than 25 €). For enforcement targeting real estate assets the fee is adds up to 1 % of the value of the property (but not less than 25 €).

If the assets have been seized and are then resold, the buyer would generally have to cover the enforcement fees.

No.

No, but it is fair to say that Bulgarian courts have a pro­enforcement attitude and foreign awards are generally recognized and enforced in Bulgaria.

Private bailiffs are generally considered more effective as they only get their full fee if the award is actually enforced so that they would normally be willing to exert themselves to enforce an award. Court officers are not considered as effective as private bailiffs (as they lack such an incentive) and thus, a claimant would generally prefer to use the services of a private bailiff.

Yes, Bulgarian courts are generally inclined to frequently invoke public policy as a ground for refusing enforcement because of the conduct of the arbitration proceedings and in cases in which the conduct of the proceedings shows no consideration for the principles of equality of the parties. Therefore, it is advisable to ensure that the arbitration proceedings are conducted in full compliance with the applicable rules and without any formal defects such as not informing a party in a timely manner about the decision of the tribunal.