Enforcing arbitral awards in England

Mark Baldock initially studied Classics at the University of Cambridge before converting to law and reading for the Bar. During his legal studies, he was a visiting lecturer at City, University of London and a researcher for a leading set of Barristers’ Chambers in London. Below he examines all relevent issues regarding the enforcement of arbitral awards in England.

Mark was called to the Bar by the Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn earlier this year. After finishing the LL.M. in International Dispute Resolution at the Humboldt University of Berlin, he will return to London to undertake a pupillage at a leading set of commercial Chambers.

The views expressed here are those of the author. Nothing in this document should be read or interpreted as constituting any form of legal advice.


Among respondents to the 2018 Arbitration Survey, conducted by White and Case and the School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary, University of London, London was shown to be the most preferred seat of arbitration (White and Case and the School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary, University of London, 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration (9 May 2018), p. 9, chart 6).

Furthermore, the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), England’s main institution, was shown by the same survey to be the second most preferred (Id., p. 13, chart 12). The LCIA’s 2018 Annual Casework Report recorded that, in that year, the LCIA recorded a record number of cases – 317 referrals in total (London Court of International Arbitration, 2018 Annual Casework Report (2018), p. 2, available at www.lcia.org/media/download.aspx?MediaId=772 [last accessed 31 May 2019]). It is safe to conclude that England is a thriving arbitration hub. The impact of the UK’s impending exit from the European Union on international commercial arbitration in London, however, remains to be seen (see e.g. N. Schmidt-Ahrendts and A. De-Jong, ‘The “Right” Place of Arbitration: How Germany Might Profit from Brexit’, (2018) SchiedsVZ 16(5) 281).

Legal framework

Jurisdiction & procedure before court

Formal and practical requirements

Substantial requirements

Effects, remedies & procedural requests


No results found.

Pablo Ortega Krstulovic

Pablo Ortega Krstulovic is a Chilean-qualified lawyer who joins us as a visiting professional from the new class of the IDR LL.M at HU. He grew up in Arica, Chile and completed his legal education at the University of Chile in Santiago. Before moving to Berlin, Pablo gained experience as an associate lawyer at one of […]

Diego Melendez Hirezi

Diego Melendez Hirezi is a Salvadorean-qualified lawyer. He graduated from the Superior School of Business and Economics of El Salvador. Currently, he is a student in the International Dispute Resolution LL.M program at Berlin Humboldt University. For more than five years, he worked as an associate in the litigation and arbitration department of Arias Law, a […]

Filippo Furlano

Filippo Furlano is a qualified lawyer in the province of Ontario, Canada, and a current candidate of the International Dispute Resolution LL.M. program at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. He holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Leicester, and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and History from McGill University. Prior to […]

About Wagner Arbitration

The law firm WAGNER Arbitration has its offices in Berlin and specializes in dispute resolution with a focus on arbitration. In addition, the firm offers comprehensive counseling services related to domestic and international business disputes and transactions.


This Journal and its contents serve informational purposes only and do not replace individual legal advice. Please contact us, should you have any inquiries or comments.

The answers provided in this questionnaire are as of April 2017. Please note that the relevant legal provisions may be subject to amendments.